RepoPilot

bevyengine/bevy vs erebe/wstunnel

bevyengine/bevy shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, bevy shows healthier maintenance signals than wstunnel. bevy rates Healthy overall while wstunnel rates Mixed. bevy was committed to 3 weeks ago with 57+ active contributors, while wstunnel last saw a commit 4 months ago with 8+ active contributors. bevy is Apache-2.0-licensed while wstunnel is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

bevyengine/bevy

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 57+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 10% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

erebe/wstunnel

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 90% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
  • Last commit 3d ago
  • 8 active contributors
  • BSD-3-Clause licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

bevywstunnel
Stars47,8106,665
Last commit24d ago4mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
Open issues3,42431
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage8%2%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? bevyengine/bevy · erebe/wstunnel

Ask AI about bevyengine/bevy vs erebe/wstunnel

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.