binary-husky/gpt_academic vs deepseek-ai/deepseek-ocr
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, gpt_academic and deepseek-ocr both show mixed maintenance signals. gpt_academic last saw a commit 4 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while deepseek-ocr last saw a commit 4 months ago with 1+ active contributor. gpt_academic is GPL-3.0-licensed while deepseek-ocr is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
binary-husky/gpt_academic →
Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
deepseek-ai/deepseek-ocr →
Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gpt_academic | deepseek-ocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 70,596 | 23,129 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 4mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 323 | 285 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 9% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? binary-husky/gpt_academic · deepseek-ai/deepseek-ocr
Ask AI about binary-husky/gpt_academic vs deepseek-ai/deepseek-ocr
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.