binarywang/wxjava vs col-e/recaf
binarywang/wxjava shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, wxjava shows healthier maintenance signals than recaf. wxjava rates Healthy overall while recaf rates Mixed. wxjava was committed to 1 week ago with 18+ active contributors, while recaf last saw a commit 4 months ago with 4+ active contributors. wxjava is Apache-2.0-licensed while recaf is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
binarywang/wxjava
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
col-e/recaf
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 93% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wxjava | recaf | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,070 | 7,160 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 6 | 83 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 11% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? binarywang/wxjava · col-e/recaf
Ask AI about binarywang/wxjava vs col-e/recaf
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.