binarywang/wxjava vs j-easy/easy-rules
binarywang/wxjava shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, wxjava shows healthier maintenance signals than easy-rules. wxjava rates Healthy overall while easy-rules rates Mixed. wxjava last saw a commit 1 month ago with 20+ active contributors, while easy-rules last saw a commit 2 years ago with 8+ active contributors. wxjava is Apache-2.0-licensed while easy-rules is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
binarywang/wxjava →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
j-easy/easy-rules →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| wxjava | easy-rules | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 32,767 | 5,244 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 21 | 88 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 52% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? binarywang/wxjava · j-easy/easy-rules
Ask AI about binarywang/wxjava vs j-easy/easy-rules
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.