bisq-network/bisq vs blankj/androidutilcode
blankj/androidutilcode shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, androidutilcode shows healthier maintenance signals than bisq. androidutilcode rates Healthy overall while bisq rates Mixed. bisq last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors, while androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors. bisq is AGPL-3.0-licensed while androidutilcode is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
bisq-network/bisq →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
blankj/androidutilcode →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| bisq | androidutilcode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,097 | 33,678 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 173 | 328 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 97% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? bisq-network/bisq · blankj/androidutilcode
Ask AI about bisq-network/bisq vs blankj/androidutilcode
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.