bisq-network/bisq vs qiurunze123/miaosha
bisq-network/bisq shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, bisq shows stronger maintenance signals than miaosha. bisq rates Mixed overall while miaosha rates Concerns. bisq last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors, while miaosha last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
bisq-network/bisq →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
qiurunze123/miaosha →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 1y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 1y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 1y ago
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| bisq | miaosha | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,097 | 26,605 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Open issues | 173 | 6 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 97% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? bisq-network/bisq · qiurunze123/miaosha
Ask AI about bisq-network/bisq vs qiurunze123/miaosha
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.