bitfield/script vs ehang-io/nps
bitfield/script shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, script shows healthier maintenance signals than nps. script rates Healthy overall while nps rates Mixed. script last saw a commit 9 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while nps last saw a commit 2 years ago with 16+ active contributors. script is MIT-licensed while nps is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
bitfield/script →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 79% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ehang-io/nps →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 70% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| script | nps | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,967 | 34,053 |
| Last commit | 9mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 26 | 525 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? bitfield/script · ehang-io/nps
Ask AI about bitfield/script vs ehang-io/nps
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.