blankj/androidutilcode vs bytedeco/javacv
blankj/androidutilcode shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, androidutilcode shows healthier maintenance signals than javacv. androidutilcode rates Healthy overall while javacv rates Mixed. androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors, while javacv last saw a commit 4 months ago with 23+ active contributors. androidutilcode is Apache-2.0-licensed while javacv is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
blankj/androidutilcode →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
bytedeco/javacv →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidutilcode | javacv | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,678 | 8,309 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 328 | 464 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 21% | 9% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · bytedeco/javacv
Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs bytedeco/javacv
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.