blankj/androidutilcode vs googlesamples/mlkit
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, androidutilcode and mlkit both show healthy maintenance signals. androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors, while mlkit last saw a commit 5 months ago with 8+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
blankj/androidutilcode →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
googlesamples/mlkit →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidutilcode | mlkit | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,678 | 4,205 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 5mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 328 | 200 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 21% | 11% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · googlesamples/mlkit
Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs googlesamples/mlkit
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.