blankj/androidutilcode vs heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue
blankj/androidutilcode shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, androidutilcode shows healthier maintenance signals than springboot-shiro-vue. androidutilcode rates Healthy overall while springboot-shiro-vue rates Mixed. androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors, while springboot-shiro-vue last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. androidutilcode is Apache-2.0-licensed while springboot-shiro-vue is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
blankj/androidutilcode →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 96% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidutilcode | springboot-shiro-vue | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,678 | 4,671 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 328 | 7 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 21% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue
Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs heeexy/springboot-shiro-vue
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.