blankj/androidutilcode vs hongyangandroid/baseadapter
blankj/androidutilcode shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, androidutilcode shows healthier maintenance signals than baseadapter. androidutilcode rates Healthy overall while baseadapter rates Mixed. androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors, while baseadapter last saw a commit 4 years ago with 2+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
blankj/androidutilcode →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
hongyangandroid/baseadapter →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
last commit was 5y ago; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidutilcode | baseadapter | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,678 | 4,711 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 4y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 328 | 115 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 21% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · hongyangandroid/baseadapter
Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs hongyangandroid/baseadapter
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.