RepoPilot

blankj/androidutilcode vs java-decompiler/jd-gui

blankj/androidutilcode shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, androidutilcode shows healthier maintenance signals than jd-gui. androidutilcode rates Healthy overall while jd-gui rates Mixed. androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors, while jd-gui last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors. androidutilcode is Apache-2.0-licensed while jd-gui is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

blankj/androidutilcode

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
  • 18 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

java-decompiler/jd-gui

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No CI workflows detected
  • 4 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

androidutilcodejd-gui
Stars33,67815,083
Last commit1y ago1y ago
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
Open issues328247
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage21%5%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · java-decompiler/jd-gui

Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs java-decompiler/jd-gui

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.