blankj/androidutilcode vs pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
blankj/androidutilcode shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, androidutilcode shows healthier maintenance signals than pojavlauncher. androidutilcode rates Healthy overall while pojavlauncher rates Mixed. androidutilcode last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors, while pojavlauncher last saw a commit 9 months ago with 9+ active contributors. androidutilcode is Apache-2.0-licensed while pojavlauncher is LGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
blankj/androidutilcode →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher →
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidutilcode | pojavlauncher | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,678 | 8,921 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 9mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 328 | 124 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 21% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.