blankj/androidutilcode vs suwayomi/suwayomi-server
suwayomi/suwayomi-server shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, suwayomi-server shows healthier maintenance signals than androidutilcode. suwayomi-server rates Healthy overall while androidutilcode rates Mixed. androidutilcode last saw a commit 2 years ago with 18+ active contributors, while suwayomi-server last saw a commit 4 months ago with 16+ active contributors. androidutilcode is Apache-2.0-licensed while suwayomi-server is MPL-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
blankj/androidutilcode
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
suwayomi/suwayomi-server
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 45% of recent commits)
- ✓MPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidutilcode | suwayomi-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,678 | 6,880 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Open issues | 328 | 163 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 21% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · suwayomi/suwayomi-server
Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs suwayomi/suwayomi-server
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.