blankj/androidutilcode vs wasabeef/android-gpuimage
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, androidutilcode and android-gpuimage both show mixed maintenance signals. androidutilcode last saw a commit 2 years ago with 18+ active contributors, while android-gpuimage last saw a commit 4 years ago with 14+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
blankj/androidutilcode
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
wasabeef/android-gpuimage
Stale — last commit 4y ago
last commit was 4y ago; no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓14 active contributors
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- •Fork & modify Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| androidutilcode | android-gpuimage | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,678 | 9,155 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 4y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open issues | 328 | 347 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 21% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? blankj/androidutilcode · wasabeef/android-gpuimage
Ask AI about blankj/androidutilcode vs wasabeef/android-gpuimage
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.