RepoPilot

bookstackapp/bookstack vs requarks/wiki

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of September 2026, bookstack and wiki both show mixed maintenance signals. bookstack was committed to today with 4+ active contributors, while wiki was committed to today with 30+ active contributors. bookstack is MIT-licensed while wiki is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

bookstackapp/bookstack

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Last commit today
  • 4 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

requarks/wiki

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • 2 moderate-severity advisories on direct dependencies
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 30+ active contributors
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

bookstackwiki
Stars19,04728,934
Last committodaytoday
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
Open issues3183
Has tests
Has CINo
Test coverage70%1%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 2 moderate · 0 low
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? bookstackapp/bookstack · requarks/wiki

Ask AI about bookstackapp/bookstack vs requarks/wiki

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.