brettwooldridge/hikaricp vs supertokens/supertokens-core
brettwooldridge/hikaricp shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hikaricp shows healthier maintenance signals than supertokens-core. hikaricp rates Healthy overall while supertokens-core rates Mixed. hikaricp last saw a commit 7 months ago with 18+ active contributors, while supertokens-core last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. hikaricp is Apache-2.0-licensed while supertokens-core is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
brettwooldridge/hikaricp →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
supertokens/supertokens-core →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); top contributor handles 96% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hikaricp | supertokens-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,109 | 15,030 |
| Last commit | 7mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 530 | 147 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 7% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? brettwooldridge/hikaricp · supertokens/supertokens-core
Ask AI about brettwooldridge/hikaricp vs supertokens/supertokens-core
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.