browser-use/browser-use vs foundationagents/metagpt
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, browser-use and metagpt both show healthy maintenance signals. browser-use was committed to 1 day ago with 7+ active contributors, while metagpt last saw a commit 5 months ago with 11+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
browser-use/browser-use →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
foundationagents/metagpt →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 4mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4mo ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| browser-use | metagpt | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 100,773 | 67,810 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 5mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 285 | 121 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 41% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 8 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? browser-use/browser-use · foundationagents/metagpt
Ask AI about browser-use/browser-use vs foundationagents/metagpt
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.