browser-use/browser-use vs langchain-ai/langchain
langchain-ai/langchain shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, langchain shows healthier maintenance signals than browser-use. langchain rates Healthy overall while browser-use rates Mixed. browser-use was committed to 1 week ago with 9+ active contributors, while langchain was committed to 1 week ago with 20+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
browser-use/browser-use
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
langchain-ai/langchain
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| browser-use | langchain | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 112,783 | 145,659 |
| Last commit | 11d ago | 12d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 393 | 447 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 50% | 60% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 8 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? browser-use/browser-use · langchain-ai/langchain
Ask AI about browser-use/browser-use vs langchain-ai/langchain
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.