RepoPilot

buildpacks/pack vs googlecontainertools/kaniko

buildpacks/pack shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, pack shows healthier maintenance signals than kaniko. pack rates Healthy overall while kaniko rates Mixed. pack was committed to 2 weeks ago with 22+ active contributors, while kaniko last saw a commit 1 year ago with 16+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

buildpacks/pack

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • 9 moderate-severity advisories on direct dependencies
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 22+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

googlecontainertools/kaniko

Mixed

Stale — last commit 1y ago

MixedDependency

last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Stale — last commit 1y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 72% of recent commits
  • 16 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

packkaniko
Stars3,00215,772
Last commit16d ago1y ago
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Open issues196760
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage57%1%
Dependency CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 10 moderate · 0 lowNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? buildpacks/pack · googlecontainertools/kaniko

Ask AI about buildpacks/pack vs googlecontainertools/kaniko

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.