burntsushi/ripgrep vs facebook/pyrefly
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, ripgrep and pyrefly both show healthy maintenance signals. ripgrep last saw a commit 1 month ago with 31+ active contributors, while pyrefly last saw a commit 4 months ago with 25+ active contributors. ripgrep is Unlicense-licensed while pyrefly is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
burntsushi/ripgrep
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Unlicense licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
facebook/pyrefly
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ripgrep | pyrefly | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 68,336 | 5,679 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Unlicense | MIT |
| Open issues | 199 | 526 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 31% | 5% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? burntsushi/ripgrep · facebook/pyrefly
Ask AI about burntsushi/ripgrep vs facebook/pyrefly
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.