burntsushi/ripgrep vs sharkdp/bat
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, ripgrep and bat both show healthy maintenance signals. ripgrep last saw a commit 1 month ago with 31+ active contributors, while bat was committed to 1 week ago with 18+ active contributors. ripgrep is Unlicense-licensed while bat is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
burntsushi/ripgrep
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Unlicense licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
sharkdp/bat
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected
- ⚠1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Token-Permissions" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ripgrep | bat | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 68,336 | 60,380 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 12d ago |
| License | Unlicense | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 199 | 426 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 31% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 1 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? burntsushi/ripgrep · sharkdp/bat
Ask AI about burntsushi/ripgrep vs sharkdp/bat
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.