bytedeco/javacv vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
lmax-exchange/disruptor shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, disruptor shows healthier maintenance signals than javacv. disruptor rates Healthy overall while javacv rates Mixed. javacv last saw a commit 4 months ago with 23+ active contributors, while disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. javacv is Other-licensed while disruptor is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
bytedeco/javacv →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
lmax-exchange/disruptor →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| javacv | disruptor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,309 | 18,326 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 464 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 9% | 41% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? bytedeco/javacv · lmax-exchange/disruptor
Ask AI about bytedeco/javacv vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.