cachethq/cachet vs louislam/uptime-kuma
louislam/uptime-kuma shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, uptime-kuma shows healthier maintenance signals than cachet. uptime-kuma rates Healthy overall while cachet rates Mixed. cachet was committed to 2 weeks ago with 4+ active contributors, while uptime-kuma was committed to 2 weeks ago with 58+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cachethq/cachet
Mixed signals — read the receipts
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
louislam/uptime-kuma
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓58+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 22% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cachet | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15,232 | 90,812 |
| Last commit | 16d ago | 16d ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 6 | 791 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 16% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? cachethq/cachet · louislam/uptime-kuma
Ask AI about cachethq/cachet vs louislam/uptime-kuma
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.