caldis/mos vs newlinedotco/flappyswift
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, mos and flappyswift both show mixed maintenance signals. mos was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors, while flappyswift last saw a commit 3 years ago with 23+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
caldis/mos
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
newlinedotco/flappyswift
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; test evidence incomplete…
test evidence incomplete; CI evidence incomplete…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mos | flappyswift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,344 | 9,688 |
| Last commit | 27d ago | 3y ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 403 | 19 |
| Has tests | ✓ | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 14% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? caldis/mos · newlinedotco/flappyswift
Ask AI about caldis/mos vs newlinedotco/flappyswift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.