caldis/mos vs pkluz/pkhud
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, mos and pkhud both show mixed maintenance signals. mos last saw a commit 1 month ago with 1+ active contributor, while pkhud last saw a commit 3 years ago with 24+ active contributors. mos is Other-licensed while pkhud is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
caldis/mos →
Solo project — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
pkluz/pkhud →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mos | pkhud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20,047 | 3,779 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 3y ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 360 | 64 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? caldis/mos · pkluz/pkhud
Ask AI about caldis/mos vs pkluz/pkhud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.