caldis/mos vs runjuu/inputsourcepro
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, mos and inputsourcepro both show mixed maintenance signals. mos was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors, while inputsourcepro last saw a commit 4 months ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
caldis/mos
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
runjuu/inputsourcepro
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; test evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mos | inputsourcepro | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,344 | 3,095 |
| Last commit | 27d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Unknown | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 403 | 51 |
| Has tests | ✓ | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 14% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? caldis/mos · runjuu/inputsourcepro
Ask AI about caldis/mos vs runjuu/inputsourcepro
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.