RepoPilot

caldis/mos vs sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui

caldis/mos shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, mos shows stronger maintenance signals than moderncleanarchitectureswiftui. mos rates Mixed overall while moderncleanarchitectureswiftui rates Concerns. mos last saw a commit 1 month ago with 1+ active contributor, while moderncleanarchitectureswiftui last saw a commit 1 year ago with 22+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

caldis/mos

Mixed

Solo project — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other); single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 1y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 1y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 1y ago

  • Stale — last commit 1y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No test directory detected
  • 22+ active contributors
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

mosmoderncleanarchitectureswiftui
Stars20,0474,096
Last commit1mo ago1y ago
LicenseOther
Open issues3602
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsConcerns signals

Want the full analysis? caldis/mos · sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui

Ask AI about caldis/mos vs sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.