catdad/canvas-confetti vs hackmdio/codimd
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, canvas-confetti and codimd both show mixed maintenance signals. canvas-confetti last saw a commit 8 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while codimd last saw a commit 8 months ago with 11+ active contributors. canvas-confetti is ISC-licensed while codimd is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
catdad/canvas-confetti →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓ISC licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
hackmdio/codimd →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7mo ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| canvas-confetti | codimd | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,558 | 10,059 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 8mo ago |
| License | ISC | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 41 | 350 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 19% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? catdad/canvas-confetti · hackmdio/codimd
Ask AI about catdad/canvas-confetti vs hackmdio/codimd
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.