chakra-ui/panda vs vanilla-extract-css/vanilla-extract
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, panda and vanilla-extract both show healthy maintenance signals. panda was committed to 3 weeks ago with 17+ active contributors, while vanilla-extract was committed to 3 weeks ago with 24+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chakra-ui/panda
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
vanilla-extract-css/vanilla-extract
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| panda | vanilla-extract | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,153 | 10,423 |
| Last commit | 26d ago | 21d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 14 | 74 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 29% | 69% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? chakra-ui/panda · vanilla-extract-css/vanilla-extract
Ask AI about chakra-ui/panda vs vanilla-extract-css/vanilla-extract
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.