chartsorg/charts vs cuberto/liquid-swipe
chartsorg/charts shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, charts shows healthier maintenance signals than liquid-swipe. charts rates Healthy overall while liquid-swipe rates Mixed. charts last saw a commit 3 months ago with 25+ active contributors, while liquid-swipe last saw a commit 5 years ago with 4+ active contributors. charts is Apache-2.0-licensed while liquid-swipe is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chartsorg/charts →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
cuberto/liquid-swipe →
Stale — last commit 6y ago
last commit was 6y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
no description (proxy for README missing); last commit was 6y ago
last commit was 6y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 6y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a test suite
- →Learn from Mixed → Healthy if: add a README + repo description
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| charts | liquid-swipe | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28,004 | 2,986 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 5y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 977 | 10 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chartsorg/charts · cuberto/liquid-swipe
Ask AI about chartsorg/charts vs cuberto/liquid-swipe
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.