chartsorg/charts vs toptal/gitignore.io
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, charts and gitignore.io both show healthy maintenance signals. charts last saw a commit 3 months ago with 25+ active contributors, while gitignore.io last saw a commit 1 year ago with 31+ active contributors. charts is Apache-2.0-licensed while gitignore.io is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chartsorg/charts →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
toptal/gitignore.io →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| charts | gitignore.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28,004 | 8,701 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 977 | 66 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? chartsorg/charts · toptal/gitignore.io
Ask AI about chartsorg/charts vs toptal/gitignore.io
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.