chatwoot/chatwoot vs mileszs/wicked_pdf
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, chatwoot and wicked_pdf both show mixed maintenance signals. chatwoot was committed to 1 week ago with 21+ active contributors, while wicked_pdf last saw a commit 1 year ago with 28+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chatwoot/chatwoot
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
mileszs/wicked_pdf
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓28+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| chatwoot | wicked_pdf | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 36,557 | 3,575 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 1y ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 1,367 | 302 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 70% | 93% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chatwoot/chatwoot · mileszs/wicked_pdf
Ask AI about chatwoot/chatwoot vs mileszs/wicked_pdf
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.