chinabugotech/hutool vs flowable/flowable-engine
flowable/flowable-engine shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, flowable-engine shows healthier maintenance signals than hutool. flowable-engine rates Healthy overall while hutool rates Mixed. hutool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 16+ active contributors, while flowable-engine last saw a commit 1 month ago with 12+ active contributors. hutool is MulanPSL-2.0-licensed while flowable-engine is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
flowable/flowable-engine →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | flowable-engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,287 | 9,241 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 3 | 398 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 16% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · flowable/flowable-engine
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs flowable/flowable-engine
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.