chinabugotech/hutool vs hotbitmapgg/bilibili-android-client
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, hutool and bilibili-android-client both show mixed maintenance signals. hutool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 16+ active contributors, while bilibili-android-client last saw a commit 5 years ago with 2+ active contributors. hutool is MulanPSL-2.0-licensed while bilibili-android-client is WTFPL-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
hotbitmapgg/bilibili-android-client →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
non-standard license (WTFPL); last commit was 5y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (WTFPL) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓WTFPL licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | bilibili-android-client | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,287 | 4,478 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 5y ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | WTFPL |
| Open issues | 3 | 9 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 16% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · hotbitmapgg/bilibili-android-client
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs hotbitmapgg/bilibili-android-client
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.