chinabugotech/hutool vs k0shk0sh/fasthub
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, hutool and fasthub both show mixed maintenance signals. hutool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 16+ active contributors, while fasthub last saw a commit 3 years ago with 19+ active contributors. hutool is MulanPSL-2.0-licensed while fasthub is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
k0shk0sh/fasthub →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 4y ago…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | fasthub | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,287 | 5,738 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 3y ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 3 | 343 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 16% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · k0shk0sh/fasthub
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs k0shk0sh/fasthub
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.