chinabugotech/hutool vs pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, hutool and pojavlauncher both show mixed maintenance signals. hutool was committed to 1 week ago with 13+ active contributors, while pojavlauncher last saw a commit 11 months ago with 9+ active contributors. hutool is MulanPSL-2.0-licensed while pojavlauncher is LGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0); dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 8mo ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | pojavlauncher | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,266 | 8,921 |
| Last commit | 13d ago | 11mo ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 5 | 124 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 52% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.