chinabugotech/hutool vs raphw/byte-buddy
raphw/byte-buddy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, byte-buddy shows healthier maintenance signals than hutool. byte-buddy rates Healthy overall while hutool rates Mixed. hutool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 16+ active contributors, while byte-buddy last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors. hutool is MulanPSL-2.0-licensed while byte-buddy is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
raphw/byte-buddy →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | byte-buddy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,287 | 6,822 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 3 | 33 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 16% | 30% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · raphw/byte-buddy
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs raphw/byte-buddy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.