chinabugotech/hutool vs snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, hutool and guide-rpc-framework both show mixed maintenance signals. hutool was committed to 1 week ago with 13+ active contributors, while guide-rpc-framework last saw a commit 1 month ago with 22+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0); dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no CI workflows detected; license evidence incomplete…
no CI workflows detected; license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | guide-rpc-framework | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,266 | 4,425 |
| Last commit | 13d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open issues | 5 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 52% | 58% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.