chinabugotech/hutool vs yudaocode/springboot-labs
chinabugotech/hutool shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hutool shows stronger maintenance signals than springboot-labs. hutool rates Mixed overall while springboot-labs rates Concerns. hutool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 16+ active contributors, while springboot-labs last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
yudaocode/springboot-labs →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | springboot-labs | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,287 | 20,094 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 2y ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 3 | 46 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 16% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · yudaocode/springboot-labs
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs yudaocode/springboot-labs
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.