chinabugotech/hutool vs zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects
chinabugotech/hutool shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hutool shows stronger maintenance signals than spring-boot-projects. hutool rates Mixed overall while spring-boot-projects rates Concerns. hutool was committed to 3 weeks ago with 16+ active contributors, while spring-boot-projects last saw a commit 3 years ago with 1+ active contributor. hutool is MulanPSL-2.0-licensed while spring-boot-projects is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chinabugotech/hutool →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MulanPSL-2.0) — review terms
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MulanPSL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
last commit was 3y ago; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; onboard a second core maintainer
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hutool | spring-boot-projects | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,287 | 5,726 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 3y ago |
| License | MulanPSL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 3 | 2 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 16% | 33% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? chinabugotech/hutool · zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects
Ask AI about chinabugotech/hutool vs zhenfeng13/spring-boot-projects
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.