chriskiehl/gooey vs d4vinci/scrapling
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, gooey and scrapling both show mixed maintenance signals. gooey last saw a commit 5 months ago with 24+ active contributors, while scrapling was committed to 1 week ago with 7+ active contributors. gooey is MIT-licensed while scrapling is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chriskiehl/gooey
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report); wire up GitHub Actions or equivalent
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
d4vinci/scrapling
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gooey | scrapling | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,891 | 78,796 |
| Last commit | 5mo ago | 8d ago |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 183 | 15 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 65% | 98% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | B | C |
| Cycles | 3 | 8 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chriskiehl/gooey · d4vinci/scrapling
Ask AI about chriskiehl/gooey vs d4vinci/scrapling
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.