chriskiehl/gooey vs tiangolo/fastapi
tiangolo/fastapi shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fastapi shows healthier maintenance signals than gooey. fastapi rates Healthy overall while gooey rates Mixed. gooey last saw a commit 3 months ago with 24+ active contributors, while fastapi was committed to today with 5+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chriskiehl/gooey →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report); wire up GitHub Actions or equivalent
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tiangolo/fastapi →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gooey | fastapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,890 | 99,696 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | today |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 180 | 100 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 72% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | B | — |
| Cycles | 3 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? chriskiehl/gooey · tiangolo/fastapi
Ask AI about chriskiehl/gooey vs tiangolo/fastapi
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.