chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains vs google/exoplayer
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, material-theme-jetbrains and exoplayer both show mixed maintenance signals. material-theme-jetbrains last saw a commit 4 years ago with 2+ active contributors, while exoplayer last saw a commit 6 months ago with 14+ active contributors. material-theme-jetbrains is Other-licensed while exoplayer is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains →
Stale — last commit 4y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 4y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
google/exoplayer →
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| material-theme-jetbrains | exoplayer | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,757 | 21,921 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 6mo ago |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 1 | 631 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 4% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains · google/exoplayer
Ask AI about chrisrm/material-theme-jetbrains vs google/exoplayer
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.