RepoPilot

cinit/qauxiliary vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than qauxiliary. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while qauxiliary rates Mixed. qauxiliary last saw a commit 1 month ago with 10+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. qauxiliary is Other-licensed while ruoyi-vue-pro is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

cinit/qauxiliary

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other); no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit today
  • 10 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

qauxiliaryruoyi-vue-pro
Stars5,56837,021
Last commit1mo ago1mo ago
LicenseOtherMIT
Open issues2733
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%32%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? cinit/qauxiliary · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Ask AI about cinit/qauxiliary vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.