cirruslabs/tart vs lwouis/alt-tab-macos
cirruslabs/tart shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, tart shows healthier maintenance signals than alt-tab-macos. tart rates Healthy overall while alt-tab-macos rates Mixed. tart was committed to 1 week ago with 17+ active contributors, while alt-tab-macos was committed to 1 week ago with 3+ active contributors. tart is Apache-2.0-licensed while alt-tab-macos is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cirruslabs/tart
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
lwouis/alt-tab-macos
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 91% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| tart | alt-tab-macos | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,707 | 16,243 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 11d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 71 | 71 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? cirruslabs/tart · lwouis/alt-tab-macos
Ask AI about cirruslabs/tart vs lwouis/alt-tab-macos
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.