cirruslabs/tart vs p0deje/maccy
cirruslabs/tart shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, tart shows healthier maintenance signals than maccy. tart rates Healthy overall while maccy rates Mixed. tart was committed to 6 days ago with 17+ active contributors, while maccy was committed to 1 week ago with 26+ active contributors. tart is Apache-2.0-licensed while maccy is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cirruslabs/tart
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
p0deje/maccy
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| tart | maccy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,707 | 21,493 |
| Last commit | 6d ago | 9d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 71 | 167 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? cirruslabs/tart · p0deje/maccy
Ask AI about cirruslabs/tart vs p0deje/maccy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.