citerus/dddsample-core vs jakewharton/butterknife
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, dddsample-core and butterknife both show healthy maintenance signals. dddsample-core last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors, while butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors. dddsample-core is MIT-licensed while butterknife is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
citerus/dddsample-core →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
- ✓Last commit 11mo ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| dddsample-core | butterknife | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,270 | 25,377 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 32 | 119 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 98% | 57% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? citerus/dddsample-core · jakewharton/butterknife
Ask AI about citerus/dddsample-core vs jakewharton/butterknife
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.