claritylab/lucida vs hollischuang/tobetopjavaer
claritylab/lucida shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, lucida shows stronger maintenance signals than tobetopjavaer. lucida rates Mixed overall while tobetopjavaer rates Concerns. lucida last saw a commit 3 years ago with 12+ active contributors, while tobetopjavaer last saw a commit 2 years ago with 15+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
claritylab/lucida →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 3y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
hollischuang/tobetopjavaer →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 34% of recent commits)
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| lucida | tobetopjavaer | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,783 | 25,426 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 2y ago |
| License | Other | — |
| Open issues | 75 | 61 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 64% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? claritylab/lucida · hollischuang/tobetopjavaer
Ask AI about claritylab/lucida vs hollischuang/tobetopjavaer
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.