clickhouse/clickhouse vs visualfc/liteide
clickhouse/clickhouse shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, clickhouse shows healthier maintenance signals than liteide. clickhouse rates Healthy overall while liteide rates Mixed. clickhouse last saw a commit 1 month ago with 19+ active contributors, while liteide last saw a commit 9 months ago with 7+ active contributors. clickhouse is Apache-2.0-licensed while liteide is LGPL-2.1-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
clickhouse/clickhouse →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
visualfc/liteide →
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
copyleft license (LGPL-2.1) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 8mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠LGPL-2.1 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓LGPL-2.1 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| clickhouse | liteide | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 47,294 | 7,753 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 9mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-2.1 |
| Open issues | 6,019 | 415 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 4% | 7% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? clickhouse/clickhouse · visualfc/liteide
Ask AI about clickhouse/clickhouse vs visualfc/liteide
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.